THIRD DYNAMIC TRIANGLE

A · B · C · D · E · F · G · H · I · J · K · L · M · N · O · P · Q · R · S · T · U · V · W · X · Y · Z

Definitions

1. I wonder if there isn't a third dynamic triangle like the ARC Triangle that goes: Maybe People are A, Service is R and Funds is C. Sort of a solid ARC triangle. Seems to work that when you drop out people you drop out service you drop out funds. An org that dismisses staff to save money drops service and winds up with a high debt. In an org when I manage one directly, I always push up numbers of staff, push up service and the money rolls in. There is a contrary fact. Governments use tons of people, absorb tons of funds and give no service and are largely out of ARC. So it isn't just numbers of people that made the A. "People" probably needs a special definition. It may be "beings" or "productive individuals" or people in affinity with each other. (OODs 6 Aug 70)

2. Third Dynamic Triangle (People - Service - Funds)