View source for Self Analysis 1951 The Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation

← [[Self Analysis 1951|Self-Analysis (1951)]]

== The Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation ==
This chart is a specialized form of the Hubbard Chart of Human Evaluation and Dianetic Processing.

A full description of each column on this chart (except the last six which are only in Self Analysis) will be found complete in ''Science of Survival.'' 

The technical name of the questioning process used in this volume is Dianetic Straight Wire with emphasis on Validation MEST processing. This is actually not “self-auditing”. It is auditing done on the reader by the author. Actually, the reader is being audited by L. Ron Hubbard. Straight Wire processing is relatively safe on any case and is the most elementary process in Dianetics.

The position of an individual on this Tone Scale varies through the day and throughout the years but is fairly stable for given periods. One’s position on the chart will rise on receipt of good news, sink with bad news. This is the usual give and take with life. Everyone however has a ''chronic'' position on the chart which is unalterable save for processing.

Necessity level (lifting oneself by one’s bootstraps as in emergencies) can raise an individual well up this chart for brief periods.

By education, such as that given under pressure, the education itself has a position on the tone scale. A person could be relatively unaberrated actually but, by education, be at a lower position on the chart than he should be. The reverse is also the case. One can be educated, then, into a higher or lower level on the chart than his own aberrations call for.

One’s environment greatly influences one’s position on the chart. Every environment has its own tone level. A man who is really a 3.0 can begin to act like a 1.1 in a 1.1 environment. However, a 1.1 usually acts no better than about 1.5 in an environment with a high tone. If one lives in a low-toned environment he can expect, eventually, to be low-toned. This is also true of marriage—one tends to match the tone level of one’s marital partner.

This tone scale is also valid for groups. A business or a nation can be examined as to its various standard reactions and these

can be plotted. This will give the survival potential of a business or a nation.

This chart can also be used in employing people or in choosing partners. It is an accurate index of what to expect and gives you a chance to predict what people will do before you have any great experience with them. Also, it gives you some due as to what can happen to you in certain environments or around certain people, for they can drag you down or boost you high.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 1. Behavior and Physiology !! 2. Medical Range !! 3. Emotion
|-
| 4.0 || Excellent at projects, execution. Fast reaction time (relative to age). || Near accident-proof. No psycho-somatic ills. Nearly immune to bacteria. || Eagerness, exhilaration.
|-
| 3.5 || Good at projects, execution, sports. || Highly resistant to common infections. No colds. || Strong interest.
|-
| 3.0 || Capable of fair amount of action, sports. || Resistant to infection and disease. Few psycho-somatic ills. || Mild interest — Content.
|-
| 2.5 || Relatively inactive, but capable of action. || Occasionally ill. Susceptible to usual diseases. || Indifference — Boredom.
|-
| 2.0 || Capable of destructive and minor constructive action. || Severe sporadic illnesses. || Expressed resentment.
|-
| 1.5 || Capable of destructive action. || Depository illness (arthritis). (Range 1.0 to 2.0 interchangeable) || Anger.
|-
| 1.1 || Capable of minor execution. || Endocrine and neurological illnesses. || Unexpressed resentment — Fear.
|-
| 0.5 || Capable of relatively uncontrolled action. || Chronic malfunction of organs. (Accident prone) || Grief — Apathy.
|-
| 0.1 || Alive as an organism. || Chronically ill. (Refusing sustenance) || Deepest apathy.
|}

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 4. Sexual Behavior / Children !! 5. Command Over Environment !! 6. Actual Worth to Society
|-
| 4.0 || Sexual interest high but often sublimated to creative thought. Intense interest in children. || High self-mastery. Aggressive toward environment. Dislikes to control people. High reasoning, volatile emotions. || High worth. Apparent worth will be realized. Creative and constructive.
|-
| 3.5 || High interest in opposite sex. Constancy. Love of children. || Reasons well. Good control. Accepts ownership. Emotion free. Liberal. || Good value to society. Adjusts environ to benefit of self and others.
|-
| 3.0 || Interest in procreation. Interest in children. || Controls bodily functions. Reasons well. Free emotion still inhibited. Allows rights to others. Democratic. || Any apparent worth is actual worth. Fair value.
|-
| 2.5 || Disinterested in procreation. Vague tolerance of children. || In control of function and some reasoning powers. Does not desire much ownership. || Capable of constructive action; seldom much quantity. Small value. "Well adjusted."
|-
| 2.0 || Disgust at sex; revulsion. Nagging of and nervousness about children. || Antagonistic and destructive to self, others, and environ. Desires command in order to injure. || Dangerous. Any apparent worth wiped out by potentials of injury to others.
|-
| 1.5 || Rape. Sex as punishment. Brutal treatment of children. || Smashes or destroys others or environ. Failing this, may destroy self. Fascistic. || Insincere. Heavy liability. Possible murderer. Even when intentions avowedly good will bring about destruction.
|-
| 1.1 || Promiscuity, perversion, sadism, irregular practices. Use of children for sadistic purposes. || No control of reason or emotions, but apparent organic control. Uses sly means of controlling others, especially hypnotism. Communistic. || Active liability. Enturbulates others. Apparent worth outweighed by vicious hidden intents.
|-
| 0.5 || Impotency, anxiety, possible efforts to reproduce. Anxiety about children. || Barest functional control of self, only. || Liability to society. Possible suicide. Utterly careless of others.
|-
| 0.1 || No effort to procreate. || No command of self, others, environ. Suicide. || High liability, needing care and efforts of others without making any contribution.
|}

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 7. Ethic Level !! 8. Handling of Truth !! 9. Courage Level
|-
| 4.0 || Bases ethics on reason. Very high ethic level. || High concept of truth. || High courage level.
|-
| 3.5 || Heeds ethics of group but refines them higher as reason demands. || Truthful. || Courage displayed on reasonable risks.
|-
| 3.0 || Follows ethics in which trained as honestly as possible. Moral. || Cautious of asserting truths. Social lies. || Conservative display of courage where risk is small.
|-
| 2.5 || Treats ethics insincerely. Not particularly honest or dishonest. || Insincere. Careless of facts. || Neither courage nor cowardice. Neglect of danger.
|-
| 2.0 || Below this point: authoritarian. Chronically and bluntly dishonest when occasion arises. || Truth twisted to suit antagonism. || Reactive, unreasoning thrusts at danger.
|-
| 1.5 || Below this point: criminal. Immoral. Actively dishonest. Destructive of any and all ethics. || Blatant and destructive lying. || Unreasonable bravery, usually damaging to self.
|-
| 1.1 || Sex criminal. Negative ethics. Deviously dishonest without reason. Pseudo ethical activities screen perversion of ethics. || Ingenious and vicious perversions of truth. Covers lying artfully. || Occasional underhanded displays of action, otherwise cowardly.
|-
| 0.5 || Non-existent. Not thinking. Obeying anyone. || Details facts with no concept of their reality. || Complete cowardice.
|-
| 0.1 || None. || No reaction. || No reaction.
|}

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 10. Speech: Talks / Listens !! 11. Handling of Comm. as Relay !! 12. Reality (Agreement)
|-
| 4.0 || Strong, able, swift, and full exchange of beliefs and ideas. || Passes theta comm., contributes to it. Cuts entheta lines. || Search for different viewpoints in order to broaden own reality. Changes reality.
|-
| 3.5 || Will talk of deep-seated beliefs and ideas. Will accept deep-seated beliefs, ideas; consider them. || Passes theta comm. Resents and hits back at entheta lines. || Ability to understand and evaluate reality of others and to change viewpoint. Agreeable.
|-
| 3.0 || Tentative expression of limited number of personal ideas. Receives ideas and beliefs if cautiously stated. || Passes comm. Conservative. Inclines towards moderate construction and creation. || Awareness of possible validity of different reality. Conservative agreement.
|-
| 2.5 || Casual pointless conversation. Listens only to ordinary affairs. || Cancels any comm. of higher or lower tone. Devaluates urgencies. || Refusal to match two realities. Indifference to conflict in reality. Too careless to agree or disagree.
|-
| 2.0 || Talks in threats. Invalidates other people. Listens to threats. Openly mocks theta talk. || Deals in hostile or threatening comm. Lets only small amount of theta go through. || Verbal doubt. Defence of own reality. Attempts to undermine others. Disagrees.
|-
| 1.5 || Talks of death, destruction, hate only. Listens only to death and destruction. Wrecks theta lines. || Perverts comm. to entheta regardless of original content. Stops theta comm. Passes entheta and perverts it. || Destruction of opposing reality. "You're wrong." Disagrees with reality of others.
|-
| 1.1 || Talks apparent theta, but intent vicious. Listens little; mostly to cabal, gossip, lies. || Relays only malicious comm. Cuts comm. lines. Won't relay. || Doubt of own reality. Insecurity. Doubt of opposing reality.
|-
| 0.5 || Talks very little and only in apathetic tones. Listens little: mostly to apathy or pity. || Takes little heed of comm. Does not relay. || Shame, anxiety, strong doubt of own reality. Easily has reality of others forced on him.
|-
| 0.1 || Does not talk. Does not listen. || Does not relay. Unaware of comm. || Complete withdrawal from conflicting reality. No reality.
|}

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 13. Ability to Handle Responsibility !! 14. Persistence on a Given Course !! 15. Literalness of Reception of Statements
|-
| 4.0 || Inherent sense of responsibility on all dynamics. || High creative persistence. || High differentiation. Good understanding of all comm., as modified by clear's education.
|-
| 3.5 || Capable of assuming and carrying on responsibilities. || Good persistence and direction towards constructive goals. || Good grasp of statements. Good sense of humor.
|-
| 3.0 || Handles responsibility in a slipshod fashion. || Fair persistence if obstacles not too great. || Good differentiation of meaning of statements.
|-
| 2.5 || Too careless. Not trustworthy. || Idle, poor concentration. || Accepts very little, literally or otherwise. Apt to be literal about humour.
|-
| 2.0 || Uses responsibility to further own ends. || Persistence towards destruction of enemies. No constructive persistence below this point. || Accepts remarks of tone 2.0 literally.
|-
| 1.5 || Assumes responsibility in order to destroy. || Destructive persistence begins strongly, weakens quickly. || Accepts alarming remarks literally. Brutal sense of humor.
|-
| 1.1 || Incapable, capricious, irresponsible. || Vacillation on any course. Very poor concentration. Flighty. || Lack of acceptance of any remarks. Tendency to accept all literally avoided by forced humor.
|-
| 0.5 || None. || Sporadic persistence towards self-destruction. || Literal acceptance of any remark matching tone.
|-
| 0.1 || None. || None. || Complete literal acceptance.
|}


{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 16. Method to Handle Others !! 17. Hypnotic Level !! 18. Ability to Experience Present-Time Pleasure
|-
| 4.0 || Gains support by creative enthusiasm and vitality backed by reason. || Impossible to hypnotize without drugs. || Finds existence very full of pleasure.
|-
| 3.5 || Gains support by creative reasoning and vitality. || Difficult to trance unless still possessed of a trance engram. || Finds life pleasurable most of the time.
|-
| 3.0 || Invites support by practical reasoning and social graces. || Could be hypnotized, but alert when awake. || Experiences pleasure some of the time.
|-
| 2.5 || Careless of support from others. || Can be a hypnotic subject, but mostly alert. || Experiences moments of pleasure. Low intensity.
|-
| 2.0 || Nags and bluntly criticizes to demand compliance with wishes. || Negates somewhat, but can be hypnotized. || Occasionally experiences some pleasure in extraordinary moments.
|-
| 1.5 || Uses threats, punishment, and alarming lies to dominate others. || Negates heavily against remarks, but absorbs them. || Seldom experiences any pleasure.
|-
| 1.1 || Nullifies others to get them to level where they can be used. Devious and vicious means. Hypnotism, gossip. Seeks hidden control. || In a permanent light trance, but negates. || Most gaiety forced. Real pleasure out of reach.
|-
| 0.5 || Enturbulates others to control them. Cries for pity. Wild lying to gain sympathy. || Very hypnotic. Any remark made may be a "positive suggestion." || None.
|-
| 0.1 || Pretends death so others will not think him dangerous and will go away. || Is equivalent to a hypnotized subject when "awake." || None.
|}


{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 19. Your Value as a Friend !! 20. How Much Others Like You !! 21. State of Your Possessions
|-
| 4.0 || Excellent || Loved by many || In excellent condition
|-
| 3.5 || Very good || Well loved || In good condition
|-
| 3.0 || Good || Respected by most || Fairly good
|-
| 2.5 || Fair || Liked by a few || Shows some neglect
|-
| 2.0 || Poor || Rarely liked || Very neglected
|-
| 1.5 || Definite liability || Openly disliked by most || Often broken. Bad repair
|-
| 1.1 || Dangerous liability || Generally despised || Poor. In poor condition
|-
| 0.5 || Very great liability || Not liked. Only pitied by some || In very bad condition generally
|-
| 0.1 || Total liability || Not regarded || No realization of possession
|}


{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Tone Scale !! 22. How Well Are You Understood !! 23. Potential Success !! 24. Potential Survival
|-
| 4.0 || Very well || Excellent || Excellent. Considerable longevity
|-
| 3.5 || Well || Very good || Very good
|-
| 3.0 || Usually || Good || Good
|-
| 2.5 || Sometimes misunderstood || Fair || Fair
|-
| 2.0 || Often misunderstood || Poor || Poor
|-
| 1.5 || Continually misunderstood || Usually a failure || Early demise
|-
| 1.1 || No real understanding || Nearly always fails || Brief
|-
| 0.5 || Not at all understood || Utter failure || Demise soon
|-
| 0.1 || Ignored || No effort. Complete failure || Almost dead
|}